Ron Lora: the hysteria over critical race theory is misplaced

Imagine you dreamed of a faraway country with a multicultural population, but a majority group that coexisted with a minority population. There was some overlap of interests, but the minority was generally treated unfairly.

They aroused suspicion, especially in certain public spaces. They found it more difficult to get loans, and when they did, it meant paying more than members of the majority. When they did, or did, they faced harsher sentences, including 20% ​​longer prison terms. The minority group often lived in impoverished areas, in part because of zoning restrictions, but also because of the red line in years past. Therefore, utilities were inferior.

Alas, this is not a dream. Understood in the context of slavery and Jim Crow laws, it becomes clear that we are talking about “systemic racism”. It is embedded in social and political institutions (courts, schools, churches, offices) and is not difficult to spot when attention is focused. A majority of black Americans have experienced this reality.

But a caveat: that doesn’t mean everyone else is racist. They probably don’t think about racism institutionally.

The national debate on race relations in our hybrid democratic republic today focuses on “Critical Race Theory” (CRT), which emphasizes the integral place of slavery and its continuing consequences in the history of states. -United. It emerged in the 1970s, shortly after the historic anti-discrimination laws of previous decades that guaranteed the right to vote for all Americans. Yet racial inequality persists. Instead of enlightening the public, however, the CRT has turned into political football.

Without having read it, critics constantly refer to the “1619 Project,” recently launched by the New York Times Magazine in the hope of broadening our understanding of American history. Racial discrimination, he points out, began when African slaves arrived in 1619 on territory that a century and a half later would become the United States. It has never been “marginal” in American history; rather, in the words of one analyst, “It was an integral part of the economic and political foundation of the nation.” It is at the heart of the compromises of our founding documents. It is essential to understand who we are and how we have become. “

Parents and excited activists are questioning this point of view. Angry arguments are common at all levels of politics; we see it played out in fanatical school board meetings and even religious congregations. CRT is intended to instill “guilt and self-loathing” in white college students, is an accusation. Another is that we are going to raise a generation of cynics about our history.

A Texas law states that teachers cannot discuss whether someone might be “discriminated against or receiving unfavorable treatment solely or in part because of the individual’s race.” They should also not teach in a way that might cause students to feel “distress or anguish” about their story. How to discuss the 650 documented lynchings of blacks without arousing distress will escape most of us.

The hysteria about critical race theory in public schools is misplaced because the theory is not actually taught there. In some graduate programs and law schools, yes, when employed to meticulously examine black life in America.

What has changed in public schools for several decades now is a broader discussion of American society. The first historians offered accounts of colonial laws and affairs. Later accounts highlighted the American Revolution and the Constitution, and military history received a huge boost after the Civil War. As the nation industrialized and became the world’s leading economic power, progressive historians such as Charles A. Beard focused on the wide array of economic forces that shaped America.

World War II, followed by the Cold War, placed the conflict between the Soviet Union and the West at the forefront of historical texts. But what really widened the field of historical studies was the exciting growth of social history in the 1960s and beyond, offering reviews of ordinary people’s lives, education, mobility. , work and leisure. Processes rather than events have moved to the center of the research. An explosion of historical monographs on women and minorities has appeared. Slavery and black history shared this broad approach to historical studies and this continues today with Project 1619 being an important example.

America’s demographics are changing dramatically, transforming our workforce and our political and economic institutions. Whites are declining in the majority population while racial minorities are increasing. The critique of critical race theory must be understood in this context. Recognizing the growing breadth of our history, with all its complexity, failures and systemic injustices, we can become better citizens of our republic.

Ron Lora, originally from Bluffton, is Professor Emeritus of History at the University of Toledo. His column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Lima News editorial board or AIM Media, owner of The Lima News. Contact him at [email protected]

About Leslie Schwartz

Check Also

New poll examines political divides on race and gender issues

Policy Respondents were asked about their support for Black Lives Matter, critical race theory, same-sex …